On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:41:55 GMT, Volkan Yazici <vyaz...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This list is also _not_ about Fedora devkit, and the PR is about Fedora >> devkit, so we are doing unrelated work here, regardless if it makes sense or >> not :) So yes, I prefer to keep it. >> >>> I think all our ppc64 code assumes le by now, so even if we could get a >>> sysroot for ppc64be to work, I doubt it will do much good for the JDK. >> >> I believe Zero is still fine with BE. >> >> Anyhow, we are doing these cross-compilation instructions largely to support >> the poor souls who are tasked with maintaining the unusual ports. So if >> Debian PPC64 BE port is alive, which I think it is, that would mean they >> build OpenJDK, that would mean they build _some_ PPC64BE config, whether >> Zero (more likely) or Server (unlikely, as it is probably broken). > > Introduced it back in 69344b10. > I think all our ppc64 code assumes le by now, so even if we could get a > sysroot for ppc64be to work, I doubt it will do much good for the JDK. FYI, and completely irrelevant for this PR, but AIX is still ppcbe. The only big endian platform left. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26821#discussion_r2285532131
