On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:31:47 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @shipilev, thanks so much for the review. 🙇 I was thinking in the same with >> @magicus while removing this row. Do you still prefer to keep it? > > This list is also _not_ about Fedora devkit, and the PR is about Fedora > devkit, so we are doing unrelated work here, regardless if it makes sense or > not :) So yes, I prefer to keep it. > >> I think all our ppc64 code assumes le by now, so even if we could get a >> sysroot for ppc64be to work, I doubt it will do much good for the JDK. > > I believe Zero is still fine with BE. > > Anyhow, we are doing these cross-compilation instructions largely to support > the poor souls who are tasked with maintaining the unusual ports. So if > Debian PPC64 BE port is alive, which I think it is, that would mean they > build OpenJDK, that would mean they build _some_ PPC64BE config, whether Zero > (more likely) or Server (unlikely, as it is probably broken). Introduced it back in 69344b10. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26821#discussion_r2285499552
