On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 14:02:11 GMT, David Beaumont <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Refactoring `ImageReader` to make it easy to add preview mode functionality 
>> for Valhalla.
>> 
>> This PR is a large change to `ImageReader` (effectively a rewrite) but 
>> reduces the surface area of the API significantly, reduces code complexity 
>> and increases performance/memory efficiency. The need for this sort of 
>> change comes from the need to support "preview mode" in Valhalla for classes 
>> loaded from core modules.
>> 
>> ### Preview Mode
>> 
>> In the proposed preview mode support for Valhalla, a resource with the name 
>> `/modules/<module>/<path>` may come from one of two locations in the 
>> underlying jimage file; `/<module>/<path>` or 
>> `/<module>/META-INF/preview/<path>`. Furthermore, directories (represented 
>> as directory nodes via the API) will have a potentially different number of 
>> child nodes depending on whether preview mode is in effect, and some 
>> directories may only exist at all in preview mode.
>> 
>> Furthermore, the directories and symbolic link nodes in `/packages/...` will 
>> also be affected by the existence of new package directories. To retain 
>> consistency and avoid "surprises" later, all of this needs to be taken into 
>> account.
>> 
>> Below is a summary of the main changes for mainline JDK to better support 
>> preview mode later:
>> 
>> ### 1: Improved encapsulation for preview mode
>> 
>> The current `ImageReader` code exposes the data from the jimage file in 
>> several ways; via the `Node` abstraction, but also with methods which return 
>> an `ImageLocation` instance directly. In preview mode it would not be 
>> acceptable to return the `ImageLocation`, since that would leak the 
>> existence of resources in the `META-INF/preview` namespace and lets users 
>> see resource nodes with names that don't match the underlying 
>> `ImageLocation` from which their contents come.
>> 
>> As such, the PR removes all methods which can leak `ImageLocation` or other 
>> "underlying" semantics about the jimage file. Luckily most of these are 
>> either used minimally and easily migrated to using nodes, or they were not 
>> being used at all. This PR also removes any methods which were already 
>> unused across the OpenJDK codebase (if I discover any issues with 
>> over-trimming of the API during full CI testing, it will be easy to address).
>> 
>> ### 2. Simplification of directory child node handling
>> 
>> The current `ImageReader` code attempts to create parent directories "on 
>> demand" for any child nodes it creates. This results in parent directories 
>> having a non-empty but incomplete set of child nodes present. This is re...
>
> test/jdk/jdk/internal/jimage/ImageReaderTest.java line 78:
> 
>> 76: 
>> 77:     @Test
>> 78:     public void testModuleDirectories() throws IOException {
> 
> I could make these more data driven (i.e. parametrized) if people want.

yes, please, it will make failures easier to identity.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26054#discussion_r2178321323

Reply via email to