On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 23:27:49 GMT, David Beaumont <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Refactoring `ImageReader` to make it easy to add preview mode functionality 
> for Valhalla.
> 
> This PR is a large change to `ImageReader` (effectively a rewrite) but 
> reduces the surface area of the API significantly, reduces code complexity 
> and increases performance/memory efficiency. The need for this sort of change 
> comes from the need to support "preview mode" in Valhalla for classes loaded 
> from core modules.
> 
> ### Preview Mode
> 
> In the proposed preview mode support for Valhalla, a resource with the name 
> `/modules/<module>/<path>` may come from one of two locations in the 
> underlying jimage file; `/<module>/<path>` or 
> `/<module>/META-INF/preview/<path>`. Furthermore, directories (represented as 
> directory nodes via the API) will have a potentially different number of 
> child nodes depending on whether preview mode is in effect, and some 
> directories may only exist at all in preview mode.
> 
> Furthermore, the directories and symbolic link nodes in `/packages/...` will 
> also be affected by the existence of new package directories. To retain 
> consistency and avoid "surprises" later, all of this needs to be taken into 
> account.
> 
> Below is a summary of the main changes for mainline JDK to better support 
> preview mode later:
> 
> ### 1: Improved encapsulation for preview mode
> 
> The current `ImageReader` code exposes the data from the jimage file in 
> several ways; via the `Node` abstraction, but also with methods which return 
> an `ImageLocation` instance directly. In preview mode it would not be 
> acceptable to return the `ImageLocation`, since that would leak the existence 
> of resources in the `META-INF/preview` namespace and lets users see resource 
> nodes with names that don't match the underlying `ImageLocation` from which 
> their contents come.
> 
> As such, the PR removes all methods which can leak `ImageLocation` or other 
> "underlying" semantics about the jimage file. Luckily most of these are 
> either used minimally and easily migrated to using nodes, or they were not 
> being used at all. This PR also removes any methods which were already unused 
> across the OpenJDK codebase (if I discover any issues with over-trimming of 
> the API during full CI testing, it will be easy to address).
> 
> ### 2. Simplification of directory child node handling
> 
> The current `ImageReader` code attempts to create parent directories "on 
> demand" for any child nodes it creates. This results in parent directories 
> having a non-empty but incomplete set of child nodes present. This is 
> referred to as the directory being "incomple...

src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/module/SystemModuleFinders.java line 
456:

> 454:             Optional<ImageReader.Node> node = 
> Optional.ofNullable(reader.findNode(nodeName));
> 455:             if (node.isPresent() && !node.get().isResource()) {
> 456:                 throw new IllegalStateException("Not a resource node: " 
> + node.get());

The IllegalStateException is problematic here, maybe you mean to add an assert?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26054#discussion_r2177784419

Reply via email to