On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:48:57 GMT, Julian Waters <jwat...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> [JDK-8305590](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305590) removed >> `-fcheck-new` when building with gcc. It turns out Visual Studio has a >> similar option, though inverted in behavior and default. >> >> It seems like /Zc:throwingNew- (the default) corresponds to gcc -fcheck-new, >> and /Zc:throwingNew corresponds to -fno-check-new (the default). >> >> The Visual Studio documentation strongly recommends using /Zc:throwingNew if >> possible, as turning it off (the default) seriously bloats code and inhibits >> optimizations. >> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zc-throwingnew-assume-operator-new-throws?view=msvc-170 >> >> As mentioned in [JDK-8305590](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305590), >> the standard says that an allocation function can report allocation failure >> either by returning null (when it must have a nothrow exception >> specification), or by throwing `std::bad_alloc` (so obviously must not be >> declared as non-throwing). HotSpot allocation functions terminate the >> program instead of throwing on allocation failure, so similarly don't need >> the result checked for null. >> >> The documentation for /Zc:throwingNew is somewhat vague and confusing, so >> some investigation is probably needed to verify it really has the desired >> effect for us. > > Julian Waters has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains three commits: > > - Merge branch 'master' into patch-15 > - -Zc:throwingNew in flags-cflags.m4 > - 8306579 One thing I have a query on: Does this need the problem with the ADLC operator new to be fixed before it can be integrated? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22039#issuecomment-2490168368