On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:39:49 GMT, Nizar Benalla <nbena...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this change that adds a new test root `docs` dedicated to 
>> testing the documentation, which has been a work in progress for a while. 
>> Tests for links, encoding, HTML, accessibility will be later added in 
>> following PRs. 
>> 
>> We also define a new make target `test-docs` meant for local use and depends 
>> on the docs.
>> This also adds the necessary configurations needed at Oracle.
>> 
>> This patch includes a test `TestDocs` which serves to show developers how 
>> they are meant to resolve the docs to test them, I want to include it 
>> temporarily until better tests are added later.
>> 
>> TIA
>
> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   use existing DOCS_JDK_IMAGE_DIR to be consistent.
>   
>   no ifneq check before assigning the env variable because  
> DOCS_JDK_IMAGE_DIR is set even docs do not exist. It will be up to the test 
> to check if the files are there

make/conf/jib-profiles.js line 1008:

> 1006:     
> testOnlyProfilesPrebuiltDocs["run-test-prebuilt-docs"].dependencies.push("docs.doc_api_spec",
>  "tidy");
> 1007:     
> testOnlyProfilesPrebuiltDocs["run-test-prebuilt-docs"].environment["DOCS_JDK_IMAGE_DIR"]
>  = input.get("docs.doc_api_spec", "install_path");
> 1008:     
> testOnlyProfilesPrebuiltDocs["run-test-prebuilt-docs"].environment["TIDY"] = 
> input.get("tidy", "home_path") + "/bin/tidy";

If we are doing another round here anyway, could you try to break up these 
lines a bit? I'm not enforcing strict 80 chars in the js file, but this is 
wider than a comfortable side-by-side diff is able to render for me.

Suggestion:

    
testOnlyProfilesPrebuiltDocs["run-test-prebuilt-docs"].environment["DOCS_JDK_IMAGE_DIR"]
            = input.get("docs.doc_api_spec", "install_path");
    testOnlyProfilesPrebuiltDocs["run-test-prebuilt-docs"].environment["TIDY"]
            = input.get("tidy", "home_path") + "/bin/tidy";

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21272#discussion_r1806408094

Reply via email to