On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 11:11:40AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 10:54:00AM +0200, Renaud Allard wrote:
> > Your configuration looks indeed very simple without anything unusual.
> > I added your tls_require_ciphers as this is the only thing that is really
> > different from my test server at connection time, but I still couldn't
> > reproduce the issue.
> > Your certificate contains multiple wildcard SAN names, that might be part of
> > the issues, although I don't see why it would be that.
> > 
> > As a suggestion, you should consider disabling rfc1413 requests unless you
> > know you need them (it's disabled by default in 4.86+).
> 
> Yes, I can comment out that section. I was never entirely sure it adds any 
> actual value.

Unfortunately commenting out that section, running a new pkg_add -vurm to get
a new exim produced identical results

2024-08-19 11:12:47 1sec8H-00000000P17-2SB8 == 
dh_iws...@vps59238.dreamhostps.com R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp defer (-54): retry 
time not reached for any host for 'vps59238.dreamhostps.com'
2024-08-19 11:12:47 End queue run: pid=33271
2024-08-19 11:13:00 1sfyRg-00000000IJK-0m6Q SIGSEGV (fault address: 
0xffffffffe3aa2caf)
2024-08-19 11:13:00 1sfyRg-00000000IJK-0m6Q SIGSEGV (maybe attempt to write to 
immutable memory)
2024-08-19 11:13:00 1sfyRg-00000000IJK-0m6Q SIGSEGV (70390 handling TLS 
incoming connection from mail.openbsd.org [199.185.178.25]
)
2024-08-19 11:13:00 1sfyRg-00000000IJK-0m6Q backtrace
2024-08-19 11:13:00 1sfyRg-00000000IJK-0m6Q ---
2024-08-19 11:13:00 1sfyRg-00000000IJK-0m6Q     0xbe2ced3bc98 <stackdump+0x38> 
at /usr/local/bin/exim
2024-08-19 11:13:00 1sfyRg-00000000IJK-0m6Q ---

so I reinstalled the locally built older one for now

All the best,
Peter

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
https://bsdly.blogspot.com/ https://www.bsdly.net/ https://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.

Reply via email to