Hello Sergey,
Op 23-10-2025 om 20:50 schreef Sergey Poznyakoff:
What I can propose instead, is to replace first occurrence of FORMAT with something more explicit, say "TIME-FORMAT".
Thanks. That will work. By the way, when compiled with -fsanitize=address, running just `src/tar --help` produces here this output after the help text: ================================================================= ==24894==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 109 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:#0 0x76f93feb4c38 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:164
#1 0x5b7e28fd04eb in rpl_realloc stdlib.h:2095
#2 0x5b7e28fd04eb in vasnprintf
/home/ben/Programoj/tar-1.35.90/gnu/vasnprintf.c:7984
#3 0x5b7e28fcb240 in vaszprintf
/home/ben/Programoj/tar-1.35.90/gnu/vaszprintf.c:32
Direct leak of 14 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:#0 0x76f93feb4887 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
#1 0x5b7e28f89c0d in imalloc ../gnu/ialloc.h:57
#2 0x5b7e28f89c0d in wordsplit_finish
/home/ben/Programoj/tar-1.35.90/lib/wordsplit.c:863
#3 0x50c0000001bf (<unknown module>)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 123 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
Does tar aim to be leak-free? Or isn't it worth the trouble for a
short invocation?
Benno
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
