On 01/03/2019 04:42 AM, Chris Clayton wrote:
Hi,
I'm building tar-1.31 on a homebrew system that is based on (Beyond)
Linux From Scratch. It is very stable even though
it is frequently ahead of LFS in terms of installed package
versions.
tar is not in BLFS and BLFS is not ahead of LFS. Both are released at
the same time.
I am building with the latest snapshot of gcc-8.
Please let me know if I there is any other information you need or
can help in any other way (e.g. test fixes).
Chris Clayton
On my reference LFS system I get:
208 tests were successful.
21 tests were skipped.
15: compress: lzip skipped (compress-lzip.at:28)
16: compress: lzop skipped (compress-lzop.at:28)
17: compress: zstd skipped (compress-zstd.at:28)
82: extracting symlinks to a read-only dir skipped (extrac07.at:30)
84: extracting even when . and .. are unreadable skipped
(extrac09.at:37)
90: extract parent mkdir failure skipped (extrac15.at:28)
96: delay-directory-restore skipped (extrac21.at:33)
109: incremental dump when the parent directory is unreadable skipped
(listed03.at:27)
131: ignfail skipped (ignfail.at:26)
150: volumes split at an extended header skipped (multiv07.at:31)
160: listing sparse files bigger than 2^33 B skipped (sparse05.at:31)
176: volume header size skipped (volsize.at:32)
184: remove-files with compression skipped (remfiles01.at:32)
216: selinux: basic store/restore skipped (selnx01.at:28)
217: acls/selinux: special files & fifos skipped (selacl01.at:28)
224: gtarfail skipped (gtarfail.at:26)
225: gtarfail2 skipped (gtarfail2.at:26)
226: multi-fail skipped (multi-fail.at:26)
227: ustar-big-2g skipped (ustar-big-2g.at:26)
228: ustar-big-8g skipped (ustar-big-8g.at:26)
229: pax-big-10g skipped (pax-big-10g.at:26)
Note that we normally build tar as root.
There were no failures. Some skips are due to missing dependencies, but
that is acceptable.
-- Bruce Dubbs
linuxfromscratch.org
