Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: ... > Your patch work fine, thank you for providing it. > > r...@point:/home/jcdr/parted-git/parted/build-O0# parted/parted > /dev/sdb print > Model: disk2go PURE II (scsi) > Disk /dev/sdb: 5243kB > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: msdos > > Number Start End Size Type File system Flags > 1 5120B 5243kB 5238kB primary > > The debug capture in attachment prove that your logic is the right one > for this case. > > Now I just wonder if parted should display FAT16 in the file system > field. Because fdisk do it: > > r...@point:/home/jcdr/parted-git/parted/build-O0# fdisk -l /dev/sdb > > Disk /dev/sdb: 5 MB, 5242880 bytes > 1 heads, 10 sectors/track, 1024 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 10 * 512 = 5120 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disk identifier: 0x00000000 > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sdb1 2 1024 5115 6 FAT16 > > And parted do it for the /dev/sdc (the regular storage device of this > USB key): > > r...@point:/home/jcdr/parted-git/parted/build-O0# parted/parted > /dev/sdc print > Model: disk2go PURE II (scsi) > Disk /dev/sdc: 2142MB > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: loop > > Number Start End Size File system Flags > 1 0.00B 2142MB 2142MB fat16
Perhaps it should, depending on what it means. Is it reporting just the magic number, or is it reporting the existence of a file system of that type? It seems that 4MiB is the minimum size of a FAT16 file system, and at 2.5MiB, yours is well under the minimum, so with the latter interpretation, parted is correct not to report it as one. _______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list bug-parted@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
