Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Jim Meyering a écrit : >> Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: >> ... >>> Your patch work fine, thank you for providing it. >>> >>> r...@point:/home/jcdr/parted-git/parted/build-O0# parted/parted >>> /dev/sdb print >>> Model: disk2go PURE II (scsi) >>> Disk /dev/sdb: 5243kB >>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B >>> Partition Table: msdos >>> >>> Number Start End Size Type File system Flags >>> 1 5120B 5243kB 5238kB primary >>> >>> The debug capture in attachment prove that your logic is the right one >>> for this case. >>> >>> Now I just wonder if parted should display FAT16 in the file system >>> field. Because fdisk do it: >>> >>> r...@point:/home/jcdr/parted-git/parted/build-O0# fdisk -l /dev/sdb >>> >>> Disk /dev/sdb: 5 MB, 5242880 bytes >>> 1 heads, 10 sectors/track, 1024 cylinders >>> Units = cylinders of 10 * 512 = 5120 bytes >>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes >>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes >>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000 >>> >>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System >>> /dev/sdb1 2 1024 5115 6 FAT16 >>> >>> And parted do it for the /dev/sdc (the regular storage device of this >>> USB key): >>> >>> r...@point:/home/jcdr/parted-git/parted/build-O0# parted/parted >>> /dev/sdc print >>> Model: disk2go PURE II (scsi) >>> Disk /dev/sdc: 2142MB >>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B >>> Partition Table: loop >>> >>> Number Start End Size File system Flags >>> 1 0.00B 2142MB 2142MB fat16 >> >> Perhaps it should, depending on what it means. >> Is it reporting just the magic number, or is it reporting >> the existence of a file system of that type? >> >> It seems that 4MiB is the minimum size of a FAT16 file system, >> and at 2.5MiB, yours is well under the minimum, so with the latter >> interpretation, parted is correct not to report it as one. > > Sorry, I failed to find where this /deb/sdb1 partition is 2.5MiB in > size. Seem to be 5.1MiB (5238kB, or (1024-2+1)*512*10/2.0**20=4.99MiB > according to fdisk) to me ( > 4MiB ). This is also confirmed by the > system while mounting the /deb/sdb1 partition:
Oh. I looked at sdb1's partition size, rather than the device size. Thanks for the correction. In that case, it sounds like a bug. Can you debug it? > r...@point:/home/jcdr/parted-git/parted/build-O0# mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt > r...@point:/home/jcdr/parted-git/parted/build-O0# df -h /dev/sdb1 > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /mnt _______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list bug-parted@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
