Hi,
On 12/18/2009 01:59 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Is this adjustment ok with you, since I'm leaving your name on it?
I don't want to leave the assignments to NULL, since they're
effectively dead code and I don't want to provoke warnings
from the likes of clang and coverity.
I understand the motivation in setting them to NULL,
but since there is obviously no further use of dev_name,
and the next use of "task" is an assignment, it seems safe.
You cannot remove the "task = NULL" statement, otherwise the task will
get destroyed a second time in the error path of the asprintf directly
below the moved "dm_task_destroy (task)"
Oh. Duh ;-)
I'll fold this into it, also removing a useless initialization.
Ack.
Regards,
Hans
From d1f4354cc2bd3ffae2afbb510bafd43f2b6857ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering<meyer...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:51:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] .
---
libparted/arch/linux.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libparted/arch/linux.c b/libparted/arch/linux.c
index d996f32..aefe788 100644
--- a/libparted/arch/linux.c
+++ b/libparted/arch/linux.c
@@ -2423,7 +2423,6 @@ err:
static int
_dm_add_partition (PedDisk* disk, PedPartition* part)
{
- struct dm_task* task = NULL;
int rc;
char* vol_name = NULL;
const char* dev_name = NULL;
@@ -2434,7 +2433,7 @@ _dm_add_partition (PedDisk* disk, PedPartition* part)
return 0;
/* Get map name from devicemapper */
- task = dm_task_create (DM_DEVICE_INFO);
+ struct dm_task *task = dm_task_create (DM_DEVICE_INFO);
if (!task)
goto err;
@@ -2453,6 +2452,7 @@ _dm_add_partition (PedDisk* disk, PedPartition* part)
/* Caution: dm_task_destroy frees dev_name. */
dm_task_destroy (task);
+ task = NULL;
if (asprintf (¶ms, "%d:%d %lld", arch_specific->major,
arch_specific->minor, part->geom.start) == -1)
--
1.6.6.rc3.271.g3d40f
_______________________________________________
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted