Hans de Goede wrote: >> Is this adjustment ok with you, since I'm leaving your name on it? >> I don't want to leave the assignments to NULL, since they're >> effectively dead code and I don't want to provoke warnings >> from the likes of clang and coverity. >> >> I understand the motivation in setting them to NULL, >> but since there is obviously no further use of dev_name, >> and the next use of "task" is an assignment, it seems safe. >> > > You cannot remove the "task = NULL" statement, otherwise the task will > get destroyed a second time in the error path of the asprintf directly > below the moved "dm_task_destroy (task)"
Oh. Duh ;-) I'll fold this into it, also removing a useless initialization. >From d1f4354cc2bd3ffae2afbb510bafd43f2b6857ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:51:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] . --- libparted/arch/linux.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libparted/arch/linux.c b/libparted/arch/linux.c index d996f32..aefe788 100644 --- a/libparted/arch/linux.c +++ b/libparted/arch/linux.c @@ -2423,7 +2423,6 @@ err: static int _dm_add_partition (PedDisk* disk, PedPartition* part) { - struct dm_task* task = NULL; int rc; char* vol_name = NULL; const char* dev_name = NULL; @@ -2434,7 +2433,7 @@ _dm_add_partition (PedDisk* disk, PedPartition* part) return 0; /* Get map name from devicemapper */ - task = dm_task_create (DM_DEVICE_INFO); + struct dm_task *task = dm_task_create (DM_DEVICE_INFO); if (!task) goto err; @@ -2453,6 +2452,7 @@ _dm_add_partition (PedDisk* disk, PedPartition* part) /* Caution: dm_task_destroy frees dev_name. */ dm_task_destroy (task); + task = NULL; if (asprintf (¶ms, "%d:%d %lld", arch_specific->major, arch_specific->minor, part->geom.start) == -1) -- 1.6.6.rc3.271.g3d40f _______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list bug-parted@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted