Make endeavours to support cross-compilation, but it doesn't because of
an infelicity in autoconf. This fixes that; well, kludges around it in
true autoconf style...
2001-07-30 Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* acinclude.m4 (NIX_FUNC_SETVBUF_REVERSED): Define a
FUNC_SETVBUF_REVERSED with (negative) results when
cross-compiling.
* configure.in: Call it.
diff -durN 3.79.1/acinclude.m4 sparc-amaterasu/acinclude.m4
--- 3.79.1/acinclude.m4 Tue Jun 20 15:00:16 2000
+++ sparc-amaterasu/acinclude.m4 Mon Jul 30 07:46:09 2001
@@ -534,3 +534,32 @@
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(LOCALEDIR, "$prefix/share/locale")
fi
fi])
+
+# From autoconf-2.52, lightly modified to allow cross-compilation.
+# Assume we are crossing to a fairly new system.
+
+AC_DEFUN([NIX_FUNC_SETVBUF_REVERSED],
+[AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether setvbuf arguments are reversed,
+ ac_cv_func_setvbuf_reversed,
+[AC_TRY_RUN([#include <stdio.h>
+/* If setvbuf has the reversed format, exit 0. */
+int
+main ()
+{
+ /* This call has the arguments reversed.
+ A reversed system may check and see that the address of main
+ is not _IOLBF, _IONBF, or _IOFBF, and return nonzero. */
+ if (setvbuf(stdout, _IOLBF, (char *) main, BUFSIZ) != 0)
+ exit(1);
+ putc('\r', stdout);
+ exit(0); /* Non-reversed systems segv here. */
+}], ac_cv_func_setvbuf_reversed=yes, ac_cv_func_setvbuf_reversed=no,
+ac_cv_func_setvbuf_reversed=no)
+rm -f core core.* *.core])
+if test $ac_cv_func_setvbuf_reversed = yes; then
+ AC_DEFINE(SETVBUF_REVERSED, 1,
+ [Define if the `setvbuf' function takes the buffering type as
+ its second argument and the buffer pointer as the third, as on
+ System V before release 3.])
+fi
+])# AC_FUNC_SETVBUF_REVERSED
+
diff -durN 3.79.1/configure.in sparc-amaterasu/configure.in
--- 3.79.1/configure.in Fri Jun 23 17:09:41 2000
+++ sparc-amaterasu/configure.in Mon Jul 30 07:40:11 2001
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
AC_FUNC_VPRINTF
AC_FUNC_STRCOLL
AC_FUNC_CLOSEDIR_VOID
-AC_FUNC_SETVBUF_REVERSED
+NIX_FUNC_SETVBUF_REVERSED
AC_CHECK_LIB(kstat, kstat_open) dnl _Must_ come before AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG.
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(pstat_getdynamic) dnl Supposedly in AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG, but...?
--
`It's all about bossing computers around. Users have to say "please".
Programmers get to say "do what I want NOW or the hard disk gets it".'
-- Richard Heathfield on the nature of programming
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
