Thank you for your feedback.
But in that case you should delete the translated version if there is no
one to maintain. An outdated and unmaintained version harm the users
more then an unexisting one.
Kind
Christian
Am 10.03.2022 19:40 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
Le 09/03/2022 à 09:08, c.bu...@posteo.jp a écrit :
Betreff: German Notation documentation out of date and buggy example
code
Datum: 09.03.2022 09:07
Von: c.bu...@posteo.jp
An: bug-lilypond-requ...@gnu.org
This is about the German version of the Notation reference.
Please compare the example code in that German and English version:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms.de.html#upbeats
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms.en.html#upbeats
The German version does not user { }. But the 2.22 release does need
them. The example in the German version throws errors.
I can't say I like this practice of the documentation, but this
is not a bug. Have a look at
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/learning/entering-input.html
“They [braces] may be omitted in some examples in this manual,
but don’t forget them in your own music!”
It is true, however, that the German documentation is generally
not up-to-date (here the braces seem to have been added at some
point). For several years, there has been nobody to update it.
Werner Arnhold seemed interested at some point, not sure if that's
still the case; CCing him. Like everything in LilyPond, translating
the documentation is a volunteer effort. Consider volunteering
yourself if you want up-to-date documentation in your native
language.
Best regards,
Jean
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
