On 5/23/20, Antonio Ortega Brook <antonioortegabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Carl: yes, that's exactly what I was looking for (although things may have > changed a bit, now...), thank you very much. As far as I can tell, > everything seems to be working as expected.
Great! Carl, feel free to open a merge request or to push new commits onto mine. > About the regression test, I'm not sure of what it means (I'm not a "real > programmer", just an amateur...) but I thought I could make a fingering > chart or something like that and check that every possible fingering is > correct in both modes with the help of a professional saxophonist. Please > let me know if I could be of help in any other way. Yes, that’s exactly what I meant. These diagrams appear to have been wrong for a decade and you’re the first one to realize that; not only were they wrong but they even made LilyPond crash, which is very very bad. Therefore we should have an exhaustive list of diagrams somewhere: first to test them all and make sure there are no other mistakes (as this discussion has proven, there are); then to make sure that future changes to LilyPond’s internal source code don’t accidentally break anything. Mike (the colleague of mine who implemented the diagrams in the first place, a long time ago) has never played any woodwind instrument, and neither have I; so if you (or Torsten) know some musicians that can help, please do! (And by the way, there are very few "real programmers" among LilyPond contributors and developers; I’m certainly not one either, and neither was Mike when he wrote that stuff. So, anyone’s welcome to help us!) Cheers, -- V. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
