Anything wrong with this suggestion? Le dim. 16 juin 2019 à 20:54, Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Add to the LSR; http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1094 > Cheers, > Pierre > > Le sam. 8 juin 2019 à 15:08, Pierre Perol-Schneider < > pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> Hi bug squad, >> >> magnifyStaff uses the same key signature padding as a full size staff (0). >> Actually, 100% of the chamber music scores facsimiles found on IMSLP have >> a larger padding on smaller staves. >> So here's a workaround proposal: >> >> \version "2.19.83" >> >> scaleStaff = #(define-music-function (scaleFac) (number?) >> #{ >> \magnifyStaff #scaleFac >> \override KeySignature.padding = #(* 2/3 (- 1 >> scaleFac)) >> #}) >> >> sizeTest = #5/7 >> keyTest = { \key cis\major s4*4 \bar "" } >> >> \markup\italic "Default output:" >> << >> \new Staff \with { \magnifyStaff #sizeTest } \keyTest >> \new Staff \keyTest >> >> >> >> \markup\italic "Regular output:" >> << >> \new Staff \with { \scaleStaff #sizeTest } \keyTest >> \new Staff \keyTest >> >> >> >> See also: https://notat.io/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=470 >> >> Cheers, >> Pierre >> > _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
