Torsten Hämmerle <torsten.haemme...@web.de> writes:
> Noeck wrote
>> I don’t know the internals enough, but isn’t it plausible that things
>> like finding the optimal line break etc. have a n² complexity
>> ("squared").
>
> Hi Joram,
>
> On the one hand, that sounds plausible, underpinned by David's evaluations.
> But I find it very interesting that it takes significantly less time if you
> replace the s4. by an R4.
s4. can be condensed almost arbitrarily. You can fit several dozens of
measures in one line then if you want to.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
