Colin Hall <colingh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:36:21PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote: >> Am 23.05.2012 00:43, schrieb -Eluze: >> > >> >Urs Liska-3 wrote: >> >>Doc suggestion concerning melisma behaviour. >> >> >> >>in >> >> >> >>2.1.1 Common notation for vocal music >> >> >> >>section >> >> >> >>Multiple notes to one syllable >> >> >> >> >> >>before or after the second example (about slurs) please add something >> >>like: >> >>"Note that phrasing slurs don't affect the creation of melismas." >> >> >> > >> > personally I don't think anybody would expect that phrasing slurs affect >> > melismata… > > I agree.
If he had considered the consequences and there were no technical obstacles. >> Well, through the (Slurs) documentation one is somehow led to >> believe slurs and phrasing slurs are practically the same and only >> separated for nesting purposes. > > I agree with this too. > >> So it would be nice if at this point of the NR it was clearly >> pointed out that there _are_ differences for the handling of >> melismas. > > I've created a documentation tracker here: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2565 And I think it's important since it stops making the choice sort of arbitrary. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
