Hello, On 21 April 2012 21:30, Thomas Scharkowski <t.scharkow...@t-online.de> wrote: >>> I'm not top posting. >> >> >> Documentation version: 2.15 >> Chapter: I’m hearing Voices >> Issue type: Uncritical, but more logical >> >> Original German text: >> >> "...wenn es sich bei den Noten um hauptsächlich homophone Musik handelt, >> in der >> hier und da polyphone Stellen vorkommen." >> >> Change "homophone Musik" to "monophone Musik". >> >> Regards, >> JUHO >> > > I think there is some confusion in the original english version - you can > use several simultanuous notes in a single voice, so "homophonic" is more > suitable than "monophonic".
Unless those notes in that single voice all '...move in parallel rhythm and pitch....' in which case it is monophonic. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophony I'm no scholar (or singer) but I am guessing that 'mono..' was used here as distinct to 'poly..' (i.e. monophony vs polyphony)? James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
