Neil Thornock <neilthorn...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Normal from what perspective? Where it left off before \cadenzaOn or >>> simply that it starts back at '0' immediately \cadenzaOff >>> >>> I'm wondering if we need something (a sentence of two) in the NR to >>> avoid what is obviously something that does confuse people. >> >> I still have not figured out the exact reasoning behind this. But it >> does not seem to be much more than "stop advancing time in measure" >> "start advancing time in measure again". If there is no material left >> to fill the bar, the measure will not get full. > > Actually, it resets timing to 0, so even if the bar has some notes > before \cadenzaOn, they don't get counted toward the timing once > \cadenzaOff is reached. So it is not "stop advancing time in measure > to resume later", but rather "stop counting altogether and then reset > to 0." > > I would think that once the timing is reset to 0, as \cadenzaOn does, > it should automatically insert a barline at that point and treat the > subsequent material as a new measure (thus avoiding problems with > accidentals). > > I really think this is a design flaw.
The reason is that the settings engraver runs after timing and default bar engravers, so the opportunity for engraving a bar is already over when the timing is getting reset by \cadenzaOff. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
