>> >> Normal from what perspective? Where it left off before \cadenzaOn or >> simply that it starts back at '0' immediately \cadenzaOff >> >> I'm wondering if we need something (a sentence of two) in the NR to >> avoid what is obviously something that does confuse people. > > I still have not figured out the exact reasoning behind this. But it > does not seem to be much more than "stop advancing time in measure" > "start advancing time in measure again". If there is no material left > to fill the bar, the measure will not get full.
Actually, it resets timing to 0, so even if the bar has some notes before \cadenzaOn, they don't get counted toward the timing once \cadenzaOff is reached. So it is not "stop advancing time in measure to resume later", but rather "stop counting altogether and then reset to 0." I would think that once the timing is reset to 0, as \cadenzaOn does, it should automatically insert a barline at that point and treat the subsequent material as a new measure (thus avoiding problems with accidentals). I really think this is a design flaw. -- Neil Thornock, D.M. No Stopping, Standing, or Parking: http://neilthornock.net/mp3s/nostopping.mp3 Assistant Professor of Music Composition/Theory Brigham Young University _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
