On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:24:42PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, James wrote: > > > Not sure if this is a 'critical', as while it is a regression, it is > > the same in current stable as it is in current dev (i.e. it was 'ok' > > in 2.12 but never was, it seems in 2.14). > > My vote is for making it critical - I think a regression from > any stable version is a critical regression. I don't think it's > worth making a 2.14.X that includes a fix, but the regression > should block 2.16.
Umm, why don't we just follow the policy? A critical regression is anything that broken in the previous two major stable versions. We are now working on 2.15, so any regression relative to 2.14 or 2.12 is critical. Regressions from 2.10 are not critical. - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
