On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, James wrote:
> hello,
>
> On 9 January 2012 11:55, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> With "2.14.2" and "2.15.2" the BreathingSign isn't positioned correct,
>> while using changed staff-size or (default) TabStaff.
>> 2.12.3-behaviour was accurate.
>>
>> %\version "2.12.3"
>> \version "2.14.2"
>> %\version "2.15.20"
>>
>> mel = { c'1 \breathe }
>>
>> \score {
>> <<
>> \new Staff\with {
>> fontSize = #-4
>> \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -4)
>> \override StaffSymbol #'thickness = #(magstep -4)
>> }
>> \mel
>>
>> \new Staff
>> \mel
>>
>> \new TabStaff
>> \mel
>>>>
>> }
>>
>
> Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2205
>
> @devs
>
> Not sure if this is a 'critical', as while it is a regression, it is
> the same in current stable as it is in current dev (i.e. it was 'ok'
> in 2.12 but never was, it seems in 2.14).
>
> So someone else needs to make that judgement if this blocks release or
> not and change the tracker accordingly
My vote is for making it critical - I think a regression from any stable
version is a critical regression. I don't think it's worth making a 2.14.X
that includes a fix, but the regression should block 2.16.
Cheers,
MS
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
