>> However, I can live with "violin1" or "violin1part3" also.
>
> "part" would be a more like a tag of a struct or index of an
> associative array, so \violin1part3 could access something
> corresponding to violin[1].part[3] in C-speak when defined properly.
Actually, it would be rather
part[3].violin[1]
and I would welcome such a possibility to add more structure.
Werner
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
