Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >> Uh, at the moment, nothing is possible since no line of code has >> been written. If you are interested about what goes on in my head, >> you'd be able to use either \violin1 or \violin#1 naturally > > \violin1 is OK for me. Regarding the calling syntax, I prefer to > define with > > \set \violin1 > > and then calling \violin1. > > However, I can live with "violin1" or "violin1part3" also.
"part" would be a more like a tag of a struct or index of an associative array, so \violin1part3 could access something corresponding to violin[1].part[3] in C-speak when defined properly. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
