"Dmytro O. Redchuk" <brownian....@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu 22 Sep 2011, 09:40 David Kastrup wrote: >> In my opinion, this report is invalid. Since Lilypond does optical >> justification of noteheads (cf node "Optical Spacing" in the Lilypond >> Essay), of _course_ its spacing depends on the stem direction. And of >> _course_ this implies that there will be a small borderline where page >> break decisions _also_ differ depending on the stem direction. >> >> A human engraver will make a random decision, and stick with this >> decision even when one stem is flipped around for the next iteration, >> changing the spacing slightly. >> >> Lilypond does not remember what it did last time around with that score, >> and it does not throw dice. > Please, I think it would be great it you added your opinion to tracker. I've > marked this issue as "needs-evidence" -- but this "evidence" should not be > lost.
I see James already added the message. I don't always figure out what kind of reply ends up in the tracker automatically (probably just those sent directly by Rietveld's tracker) and what not. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
