On 2/3/11 7:17 PM, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
> On 2/2/11 11:09 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Please tell me what a better/correct chord would be. >> > > The xml calls out a negative fret > (input/regression/musicxml/71e-Tabstaves.xml) : > > 673 <notations> > 674 <technical> > 675 <string>5</string> > 676 <fret>-7</fret> > 677 </technical> > 678 </notations> > > I don't know where your xml source came from, but it seems like that is the > place to fix this problem. Raising by an octave would get us to the 5th fret, > which seems to be a reasonable place for this chord. > > I've changed the note up an octave, and the fret to the 5th fret, and am > currently doing a make test. I've fixed the xml with the raised octave and pushed the fix. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
