On 2/2/11 11:09 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Wednesday, February 02, 2011 5:44 PM
> 
>> Nope, the problem is that this file now spits out a warning,
>> which causes the regtests to fail. In particular, with the
>> given tuning the frets of
>    \key c \major b8 \3 <d,, d g a a>8 \5 \6 \6 \5 \5
>> in PartPFourVoiceOne on string 5 seem to be negative... I don't
>> know much about tab staves and string frets, so I have no idea
>> what would be a correct chord/fingering.
> 
> If that is so this must be a different problem.  I only relayed
> what worked for me on exactly the same snippet, 71e-TabStaves.ly,
> AFAIR, although in my case it was make doc that failed, not the
> regtests.
> 
>> Please tell me what a better/correct chord would be.
> 

The xml calls out a negative fret
(input/regression/musicxml/71e-Tabstaves.xml) :

 673         <notations>
 674           <technical>
 675             <string>5</string>
 676             <fret>-7</fret>
 677           </technical>
 678         </notations>

I don't know where your xml source came from, but it seems like that is the
place to fix this problem.  Raising by an octave would get us to the 5th
fret, which seems to be a reasonable place for this chord.

I've changed the note up an octave, and the fret to the 5th fret, and am
currently doing a make test.

Thanks,

Carl


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to