Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2011, um 22:25:51 schrieb David Kastrup: > So what do we get? The part combiner messes with the beaming in a > manner that does not look like an improvement (arguably by design),
The "problem" with beaming is that the chord (<cis e>16) on the second 8th of the third beat is placed in a different voice than the previous eighth and the following 16th and 32th... The part-combiner uses three different voices: One for combined melodies (like a2, solo, solo 2 and chords), and two for separate melodies. As lilypond lacks any way for cross-voice beaming/slurin/tieing, there is no chance to get what you want without forcing the two voices to be apart for basically the whole measure (i.e. place a \partcombineApart at the begin of the measure and \partcombineAutomatic at the end to use standard part- combining again after the measure) > and > it starts off a spontaneous "Solo" on the last note from violin 1 that > is not quite called for since violin 2 is not yet finished. Because the part-combiner does not check how long notes are... It just checks onsets of notes. You can, however, force the partcombiner to a given combination strategy by inserting \partcombineApartOnce before the final e16 of the first voice of the measure. Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
