"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes:
> \relative c' {
> \clef bass cis2 c
> \clef tenor cis2 \clef bass c % natural is not printed!!
> \clef bass cis2 \clef tenor c
> }
Could you _please_ _never_ write an answer or comment in the _signature_
of the original posting? Sensible mailreaders don't quote the signature
when replying, cutting away all of your content.
Now to your comment:
> It's doing what I would expect from reading the regtest - i.e. - when
> there is a clef change, the accidentals are reset to that which you'd
> expect from the key. Therefore, in your example we return to C major,
> and so there's no need to print the accidental. I'd welcome other
> thoughts as to whether this is correct, though.
I don't think it is correct. If you set the above with \key g\major,
you will notice that the key signature is _not_ repeated with a clef
change. So there is no visual or logical reason to assume "accidentals
are reset". If that was the underlying assumption for a clef change,
the key signature would be repeated.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
