On 8/14/10 12:05 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:59:59AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> On 8/14/10 10:07 AM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: >> >>>> These diagrams are so good we really should try to >>>> get them in the docs for 2.14. >>> >>> ok, then either you or Carl should go ahead and commit them. If >>> they're not in the Changes, add them there, too. >> >> The diagrams are already in. > > By "them", I mean "in the docs for 2.14". > >> But the docs are only in the regtest. So I guess it comes under >> 898 as a Critical issue. > > No; 989 is now specifically for 2.12.3 regtests. Anything added > in 2.13 comes under 1217, which is *not* release-blocking. No, I > don't want to talk about it until 2.15 starts. Oh, yes. Sorry about the noise on this one. > >> There is no entry in Changes, but I'd like to keep it that way until the >> patch for changing the syntax is applied. > > Long story short: > - get that patch approved by Mike. > - then you (Carl) write+push NR material for these diagrams. > - then you (Carl) add something to Changes. Will do. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
