On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:59:59AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > On 8/14/10 10:07 AM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > > >> These diagrams are so good we really should try to > >> get them in the docs for 2.14. > > > > ok, then either you or Carl should go ahead and commit them. If > > they're not in the Changes, add them there, too. > > The diagrams are already in.
By "them", I mean "in the docs for 2.14". > But the docs are only in the regtest. So I guess it comes under > 898 as a Critical issue. No; 989 is now specifically for 2.12.3 regtests. Anything added in 2.13 comes under 1217, which is *not* release-blocking. No, I don't want to talk about it until 2.15 starts. > There is no entry in Changes, but I'd like to keep it that way until the > patch for changing the syntax is applied. Long story short: - get that patch approved by Mike. - then you (Carl) write+push NR material for these diagrams. - then you (Carl) add something to Changes. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
