On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
> Jean-Francois sent a minimal example, so I think this is ready for a bug
> report.
[...]
> I present you a very simple score with the problem :
>
> - one measure without quotation
> - one measure with quotation, and the sharp wich disappears
> - one mesure corrected, with a forced sharp
>
> % begin of the code
> \version "2.13.27"
>
> % setup a context for cue notes.
>
> partScoreQuotation = {
> \relative c'' {
> c8 d e fis
> }
> }
>
> \addQuote Quotation \partScoreQuotation
>
>
> % Score without quotation
>
> \new Staff \relative c'' <<
>
> \new Voice {
> r2 c4 fis
> }>>
>
> % score with quotation - note the sharp wich disappears on the fis in main
> voice
>
> \new Staff \relative c'' <<
>
> \new Voice {
> \cueDuring #"Quotation" #UP {
> r2
> }
> c4 fis
> }>>
>
> % score with quotation and a forced sharp on the fis in main voice
>
> \new Staff \relative c'' <<
>
> \new Voice {
> \cueDuring #"Quotation" #UP {
> r2
> }
> c4 fis!
> }>>
>
> % end of the code
>
> Normaly, the player don't have attention to the quotation, it's a simple
> cue, and the sharp on the fis off the main voice 'll not be played.
> The latest notation is thus necessary (with a manual forced sharp) for a
> good execution.
>
> I think thus that the quotation must not clear the sharp of the main voice.
Thanks for the example.
I agree that \cueDuring should have special handling like this.
Probably not for \quoteDuring, since that serves a different purpose,
but definitely for \cueDuring.
I made your example a little smaller and submitted it here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1191
Thanks,
Patrick
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
