On 11 May 2010 19:51, Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Patrick: > I think I will never agree with the choice of issue's priority, > I would definitely set this one to "Priority-Medium" instead of > "Priority-Low" as there is no trivial workaround here > (apart from using manual beaming [ ] in each involved measure). > Or maybe I'm wrong about this.
I agree, but would go a bit further: this broke between 2.10 and 2.12, so it should be classified as a critical regression. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
