Comment #5 on issue 694 by nateaufdeutsch: Enhancement: arrowed heads for microtone accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=694

I am said C.F. Peters freelancer using Josephs accidentals. They work brilliantly for untransposed parts. All thats missing are the details for transposition. I'm contemporary trumpet soloist in Germany, and looking through my literature, there are several way in which composers like to notate microtonality. One is the default way lilypond notates then (backwards flats etc.), the other, more popular is with arrows. For me as a player, I find the arrows much easier to read. Other composers come up with their own way, sometimes using several in combination. backwards flats for quarter-flat, arrows for slightly sharp or flat. Its a complicated issue, but atleast for notation purposes (MIDI asside), one should be free to choose the accidental-style, just as one can choose the NoteHead style. The transposition issue
should be easy enough to fix.  I gave lilypond a definition for a
double-sharp-quartertone-up, and it transposed without a problem (just missing the
proper glyph).

In Europe, using microtones has been standard for a long time (the piece I#m
currently typesetting is from 1987!!). Lilypond can and should be there with us!

As v.villaneve mentions, people are willing to pay! I'm certainly looking for a way
to donate to lilypond.....

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to