On 2009/03/28, at 13:46, Graham Percival wrote:
Also, convert-ly requires decorator functions (I think that was
the name), which are another 2.4 feature.
decorators are another issue. No back compatibility in python < 2.4.
Sometimes I wonder why are we coding python if it changes so much...
Does Guido expects that we keep rewriting our old work over and over
again?
Sorry for the rant. Each time I think about such things I love lisp
more and more...
I should clarify another point: out of all the main developers, I
know the least about python and cross-platform building. I'm just
discussing these points with you because I happen to have time at
the moment, and I remember (most) of the answers from when I asked
these questions in the past few years. :)
Thank you, you've been quite helpful. I hope I can contribute on
this. If lilypond-book manages to get well&easily installed in the
mac systems maybe the big bunch of musicians and mac users start to
switch to lilypond, namely to prepare lesson materials or simple
texts with musical ideas. This latex lilypond integration is a very
good concept.
Cheers,
Cláudia
|♪♫♪|♫♫|♪♫♪|
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
