Neil Puttock wrote: > > Just to let you know, we've just changed the code for rationals so > they use 64 bits of precision rather than 32. This should hopefully > solve the problems you've been having. The new code will be in the > next development release, 2.11.59. > > I've attached a re-run of your snippet using the new code; it's much > improved since it correctly renders the whole system. >
Amazing result! Will this 64 bits stuff work on 32 bits PCs? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/spacing%2C-version-2.10-and-2.11-tp18665268p19557365.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
