> 2008/7/29 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> 2008/7/26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> This files compiles on the stable version but hangs on the 2.11. (i.e >>> it >>> keeps compiling). >>> Is there a reason and how to by-pass it ? >> >> Hi Karim, >> >> stupid question: have you tried to let LilyPond work for more than >> twelve hours without doing anything else with your computer? We need >> to know if it's caught in a infinite loop, or if it just takes a >> veeery long time to process your file... > > I've tried the test file on Linux x64 and it compiles OK (apart from > producing the same timing errors as 2.10.33 under Windows); the output > is almost identical, though I wonder whether Karim's pushing LilyPond > beyond its limitations with the nested \times sections and scaled > durations. I'd imagine there's some pretty hairy maths going on there. > > In any case, neither version seems to be completely happy with the > file, since some of the notes are missing. > > Regards, > Neil >
THanx Neil for testing it. I however tried the suggestion of Valentin and did some compilation on an x86 linux (2.11.x version) and it just run without a result. Another problem might be also that when you have a 1024th note maybe here there's no beams for it , or i might be wrong. Best Karim _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
