[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:42:46 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is it globally slow, or is there a specific part which is recognizably
responsible for the poor performance ? (Generating
PS/PS2PDF/generating MIDI/parsing/analysis...)
D.
I don't believe it's the compiling that is slow; it seems to take 30-50
seconds just to START compiling after I invoke lilypond (whether through
double-click, click-and-drag, command line, etc.) Once it starts it
produces all the files quickly. I know this because I double-click
lilypond and nothing happens - then 30 seconds later a command window
pops up and starts working away. I have duplicated this behavior on
several other installs of Windows XP SP2 at my school with Lilypond
2.6.x and 2.7.x.
I believe that this is related to a FontConfig problem. You can verify
this, by running the console version from cmd.exe and invoking it as
lilypond --verbose bla.ly
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
