Odd. There were such files (most of them empty) in various installation directories. I removed them all, and ran Lily in two different ways, there seems to be no font cache file created :-(
Performance is not significantly different from what I'm used to, but typically, it does *not* spend 30' doing nothing before starting to parse. Isn't this odd ? D. Quoting Darius Blasband <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>> Can you see what happens if you run lilypond with administrator rights? > >> > >> > >> > >> I only ever run with admin rights. > >> XP is pretty unusable if you don't... haha. > > > > > > In that case, the real question is where the cache is going on > > platforms that don't run that slowly. Darius, can you figure out where > > the fonts.cache-1 files are going on your computer? > > > No problem. As soon as I get back from day job to night job (after my > children-evening job). > > D. > > > > _______________________________________________ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > > > _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
