Samuel Thibault, le dim. 08 juin 2025 21:57:14 +0200, a ecrit: > Diego Nieto Cid, le jeu. 29 mai 2025 23:30:58 +0100, a ecrit: > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 04:26:38AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > > Normally it works but possibly it got broken by some upstream change. > > > git bisect welcome to determine what broke it. > > > > > > > Ok, I finally could do a bisection for this issue and the result is the > > following[1]: > > > > demo@debian:~/dev/hurd/upstream/glibc$ git bisect view > > commit 25d37948c9f3f483d63302b9967b975d3bd74a4e (HEAD, tag: first-bad) > > Author: Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijks...@arm.com> > > Date: Thu May 1 19:58:38 2025 +0000 > > > > malloc: Improve malloc initialization > > > > Move malloc initialization to __libc_early_init. Use a hidden > > __ptmalloc_init > > for initialization and a weak call to avoid pulling in the system > > malloc in a > > static binary. All previous initialization checks can now be > > removed. > > > > Reviewed-by: Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> > > Thanks! > > I tracked that down to __ptmalloc_init using random_bits whcih uses > clock_gettime, thus an RPC, but at this stage we haven't called > __mach_init() for libc yet. I'll fix that.
I have pushed it. Samuel
