Diego Nieto Cid, le dim. 25 mai 2025 20:40:18 +0100, a ecrit: > > > > Perhaps you are missing the libc.so.0.3 -> libc.so symlink in your build > > directory? or elf/ld-x86-64.so.1 -> ld.so? or mach/libmachuser.so.1 -> > > libmachuser.so or hurd/libhurduser.so.0.3 -> libhurduser.so > > > > Hmm, it doesn't seem to be the case: > > demo@debian:~/dev/hurd/upstream/glibc-build$ ls -l *.so* elf/*.so* > mach/*.so* hurd/*.so* > -rwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 1398528 May 24 19:34 elf/ld.so > * lrwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 5 May 24 19:34 elf/ld-x86-64.so.1 -> ld.so > -rwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 36928 May 24 19:34 elf/sotruss-lib.so > -rwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 1733416 May 23 23:05 hurd/libhurduser-link.so > -rwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 1741152 May 24 19:34 hurd/libhurduser.so > * lrwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 14 May 24 19:34 hurd/libhurduser.so.0.3 -> > libhurduser.so > -rwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 14449640 May 24 19:34 libc.so > * lrwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 7 May 23 23:41 libc.so.0.3 -> libc.so > -rwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 636000 May 23 23:04 mach/libmachuser-link.so > -rwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 639368 May 24 19:34 mach/libmachuser.so > * lrwxrwxr-x 1 demo demo 14 May 24 19:34 mach/libmachuser.so.1 -> > libmachuser.so
That looks good indeed. > Or should I have them in the root build directory next to libc.so? No, testrun.sh sets the ld search path properly. > I feel being clueless I'm wasting everybody's time here, sorry. Maybe I > should try from a clean > VM and glibc source tree, although I don't think my changes make any > difference. It could make a difference. Better make sure that a pristine tree works fine, for a start. Samuel
