Sergey Bugaev, le mer. 09 août 2023 11:48:29 +0300, a ecrit: > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 4:10 AM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> > wrote: > > So, is anybody against making this change? > > I trust Flávio to understand RPC ABI much better than I do. > > That being said, I don't quite understand the point of this change: we > cannot get rid of mach_msg_type_long_t completely on 32-bit platforms > anyway, so what advantages does this bring?
It makes mach_msg_type_long_t shorter, down to 8 from 16 bytes. Samuel
