Svante Signell, le mer. 18 nov. 2020 13:40:48 +0100, a ecrit: > On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 22:51 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le mar. 17 nov. 2020 22:47:04 +0100, a ecrit: > > > On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 21:59 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Svante Signell, le mar. 17 nov. 2020 21:56:33 +0100, a ecrit: > > > > > Got it. Can some of the drivers be tested with software > > > > > rendering, > > > > > like swrast? > > > > > > > > software rendering does not use drm/dri. That's already what we > > > > are using (and have been using for years) for -vga std or cirrus. > > > > > > So having more mesa packages building is worthless? > > > > I don't mean it's worthless, I mean it already used to be building > > and working fine. Now that it builds fine again, I have little doubt > > that software rendering works fine. > > My question is merely if there is any idea of submitting my patches for > mesa, enabling builds of more mesa and other packages.
Sure! We do need mesa as a dependency for various packages. We have always been using software rendering in the past years, but that's completely fine enough for our needs. Samuel
