On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 22:51 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le mar. 17 nov. 2020 22:47:04 +0100, a ecrit: > > On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 21:59 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Svante Signell, le mar. 17 nov. 2020 21:56:33 +0100, a ecrit: > > > > Got it. Can some of the drivers be tested with software > > > > rendering, > > > > like swrast? > > > > > > software rendering does not use drm/dri. That's already what we > > > are using (and have been using for years) for -vga std or cirrus. > > > > So having more mesa packages building is worthless? > > I don't mean it's worthless, I mean it already used to be building > and working fine. Now that it builds fine again, I have little doubt > that software rendering works fine.
My question is merely if there is any idea of submitting my patches for mesa, enabling builds of more mesa and other packages. (even if software rendering is the only solution for now.) Thanks!
