On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:41:30PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: > 1. Do you consider the comment describing which symbols are pulled > from the header as noise or worthwile information?
Noise. > 2. Do you consider it too noisy to include mach-shortcuts.h instead of > mach.h for stuff like mach_port_allocate? Yes, but I guess such occurrences are rare. > 3. libihash/ihash.c includes <hurd/ihash.h>. Shouldn't it include > "ihash.h" instead, so that it gets the local version instead of the > one in /usr/include? It probably should, yes. -- Richard Braun
