Hi! On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:11:08 +0100, I wrote: > On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:33:28 +0000, Pino Toscano <toscano.p...@tiscali.it> > wrote: > > commit 306f359688afa254dc8728c73afab0fdb33d39ab > > Author: Pino Toscano <toscano.p...@tiscali.it> > > Date: Sat Mar 16 19:32:28 2013 +0100 > > > > drop the gnat gsoc project idea > > > > gnat has been ported recently, so a whole gsoc on it is not needed > > anymore > > I'm inclined to restore that item once again (Samuel also had deleted it > once before, and I restored it).
Done in commit 0f4186b7136e5e55a0e6028d2b92db3f71411a44. > While indeed a basic port has been done > by Svante, there's still lots of work remaining that is worth more than > one GSoC. The port is not yet upstream: the maintainer raised some > concerns that I have not yet found the time to follow up on. While the > test results of the GCC/GNAT testsuite don't look bad (but there are a > few unresolved issues, and the testsuite appears to be a rather small > one), I don't know if the port has yet seen any real-world usage. > Svante, did you test it for any bigger Ada code bases, or any Ada > testsuites? Ping. > And then there's the whole topic of language bindings, etc. > Of course, the item's description is due for some updating/rewording, as > mentioned by Svante earlier today, too. Did that, too. Grüße, Thomas
pgpRq3uRb543B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
