Hi! On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 19:59:35 +0200, Pino Toscano <toscano.p...@tiscali.it> wrote: > Alle giovedì 27 settembre 2012, Thomas Schwinge ha scritto: > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:04:05 +0200, Guillem Jover > <guil...@hadrons.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 00:30:39 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > > Alle lunedì 24 settembre 2012, Thomas Schwinge ha scritto: > > > > > Is --with-version-suffix the standard name for this option? > > > > > > > > No idea, to be honest :) > > > > > > I don't think there's any such standard name for this. > > > > Right, probably not too wide-spread. GCC has: > > > > --with-pkgversion=PKG Use PKG in the version string in place > > of "GCC" > > > > Without setting that: > > > > i686-pc-gnu-gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20110905 (experimental) > > > > With setting it: > > > > gcc (Debian 4.7.1-7) 4.7.1 > > > > (Search for case-insensitive pkgversion in config/acx.m4, > > gcc/Makefile.in, gcc/toplev.c, gcc/version.c.) Would that seem > > reasonable for GNU Mach, too? > > It is not the same thing, --with-pkgversion replaces only the part > inside the brackets, but it does not affect the actual version.
Well, my implied question was whether that might be deemed appropritate for GNU Mach, too: »gnumach (Debian 1.3.99.dfsg.git20110227-1) 1.3.99«. If not... > I updated the patch as said above. ..., then this patch is OK. Grüße, Thomas
pgp3Mq5q8NRI5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
