---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Oz <gnulo...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:24 PM Subject: Re: live cd To: Michael Walker <m...@barrucadu.co.uk>
i am happy with unstable and slow, if its not to hard to install. :) On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Michael Walker <m...@barrucadu.co.uk> wrote: > On 25 February 2011 21:44, Oz <gnulo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Debian Gnu/Hurd seems to be complicated to install from what i >> understand because 1 its not a live cd or install cd. 2-you need qemu >> virtulization. I want to run it natevly as the sole operating system >> on one netbook i have. i dont know or understand much i am a ubuntu >> gnu/linux user and have been using gnu/linux for a couple of years and >> am truly a noob compared to you guys but want to use a fully free >> system and support the gnu project. but i need the easiesest route >> possible :) thats why i was think about the arch hurd live cd. >> > > If you're going to use the graphical one, be warned that that's pretty > much just a proof-of-concept. It's a pet project one of the devs is > working on and is pretty slow/unstable. Also, the official > installation CD is pretty unstable, too. > > -- > Michael Walker (http://www.barrucadu.co.uk) > > Arch Hurd Developer; GNU Webmaster; FSF member #8385 > http://www.archhurd.org http://www.gnu.org http://www.fsf.org >
